Archive for the '科技革命' Category

Face/Off

最近在新聞上看到一則新聞有關 Face Transplant. 這是美國做過最艱難的一個則臉部手術, 也是世界首例.

這手術困難的地方在於必須小心保留整張新臉的神經及血管, 把這些跟接受者臉部的神經/血管結合. 在手術結束幾分鐘就可以知道手術有沒有成功: 血管開始有血液流動.

在這個例子裡, 這位女士在五年前臉部受到槍擊幾乎全毀. 常有呼吸困難的情形, 並且無法順利進食. 這五年裡他幾乎是活在孤獨的生活中因為不管大人小孩都害怕那幾乎全毀的臉.

主治醫生說 「這種手術, 並不是要讓病人變漂亮, 而是讓這人再次被這社會接受

看到這新聞的時候, 我的感想只有 「這女人真的是太勇敢了!

在同樣的情況下, 我不曉得有多少人可以承受別人異樣的眼光. 在幾乎失去一切, 無法正常呼吸, 正常進食, 失去嗅覺味覺得痛苦時, 還繼續鼓起勇氣活下來….我想, 我, 應該不能…

Link to video: U.S. Face Transplant Appears for First Time

The Power of (Combined) Information

秋天轉冬天是流行性感冒最嚴重的季節. 而 Google 利用強大的使用者配合所收集到的資訊, 來預測哪些地方在哪時候可能會有流行性感報爆發的危機 – Google Flu Trends. 據 Google 官方統計, 藉由這管道所預測的時間點要比 CDC 所收集到的資料還要快兩星期.

這是一個蠻簡單的構想, 但很有用. Google 使用每個人所搜尋的資料來得知哪些地方開始有很多人搜尋有關 "flu." 因為每一個 IP 都可以查到那個 IP 的所在位置 (或附近, 雖然有時候使用 proxy 會出現不正確的位置, 但大部分的普通使用者並不會使用 proxy), 而這些資料配合在一起就成為另一個更強大, 更有意義的資訊. 搜查關鍵字跟追查 IP 地址並不是什麼特別困難的東西. 但重點就是想到能夠把他們兩樣東西結合在一起, 配合時間這第三個因素, 組合出更有用的資料.

在這資訊爆炸的時代, 有能力可以蒐集到數量龐大的資料已經不是新鮮事. 但如何把眾多資訊組合在一起變成更強大的力量才是重點. 雖然目前大家能想到的可能都跟網路有關係, 但也有些例子是非常簡而易懂的.

必如說氣溫. 氣溫本身不是什麼特別的資料. 今天 32 度, 昨天 20 度. 但如果把氣溫跟時間連在一起, 就可以明顯看出來每一年的平均氣溫都在增加, 進而延伸到成為支持溫室效應的證據.

其實像許多大家使用的網站也都是利用每個人提供的資訊來賺錢. 譬如說很多人在使用的 facebook. 他裡面有許多 application 就是利用大家應該都會提供真的資訊來賺錢. 與其使用一堆問卷, 不如創造一個 fb app 來讓這些使用者在使用時, 把這些寶貴的資料提供出來. 而且, 當大家在填問卷時很多時候都會亂填 (至少我都是這樣, 年收入給他填個 $100,000+), 但在 facebook (或其他社群網站) 上, 大家給予真實答案的機率就相對的提高. 第一, 想要找到真正跟你類似的人. 第二, 如果扯的太嚴重, 朋友群內也會有人戳破吧~

現在資料的重要性就等於是金錢, 只要可以聰明的運用所擁有的資料, 就有出頭的一天 <- 對自己說 (唉, 說是這麼說, 要如何真的實踐也是有他的困難度的…). 創業, 真的不容易, 需要有很大的決心! 要放下一些已經擁有的東西, 去追求一個未達成的夢, 是美, 卻也是最困難的.

MacBook Air

恩…繼 iPhone 之後 to-buy list 又多了一樣…


MacBook Air Ad


MacBook Air Guided Tour

但, USD$1799 起跳…-_-

Google Adsense…*sigh*

相信大家都有發現我的 blog 上面有所謂的 Google Adsense 照理說, 這些廣告是從網頁上的內容, 找出最符合那內容的廣告. 我個人是很希望大家去按, 這樣我才會有非.常.微.薄.的收入. 但是, 今天我突然看到很有趣的廣告…

GoogleAds Google Adsense...*sigh*
驚!!! 我寫了什麼東西, 竟然出現有關”飯島愛”的廣告 (無言中…如果你真的不知道的話, 飯島愛是個還算出名的 AV 女優). 重要的是, 它跟旁邊的”朝聖”廣告放在一起, 不覺得有點嗎? 我想了又想, 完全無法理解這兩個廣告是怎麼出現在我的 blog 上. 是 interview? 是 Nintendo Wii? 還是 Web 2.0?
WELL, WELL. Google 可能在英文搜尋引擎方面很強, 但, Google Taiwan (繁體中文) 真的需要加強了!
p.s. 因為當時在上課, 所以沒有按進那廣告. 有幸再看到這廣告的人可以按進去, 然後跟我說一下有什麼有趣的內容可以彌補寂寞?!

Web 2.0…

Web 2.0, a phrase (or buzzword) heard/used by many people, should sound familiar to you. Or, as I should say, that you are actually experiencing it NOW. Blog, Youtube, wiki are all examples of Web 2.0 in action, just to name a few. 
“Web 2.0, a phrase coined by O’Reilly Media in 2004, refers to a supposed second generation of Internet-based services—such as social networking sites, wikis, communication tools, and folksonomies—that emphasize online collaboration and sharing among users.”

Wikipedia.com

Web 2.0 is not just a new technology, but a new idea. It’s an upgrade from old thoughts. It is revolutionizing the way that the world operates. The emergences of Internet and web2 forces us, everyone, to re-think the idea of “authorship,” “copyright,” etc.

From O’Reilly’s website,

    • The Long Tail
      Small sites make up the bulk of the internet’s content; narrow niches make up the bulk of internet’s the possible applications.
      • Therefore: Leverage customer-self service and algorithmic data management to reach out to the entire web, to the edges and not just the center, to the long tail and not just the head.
    • Data is the Next Intel Inside
      Applications are increasingly data-driven.
      • Therefore: For competitive advantage, seek to own a unique, hard-to-recreate source of data.
    • Users Add Value
      The key to competitive advantage in internet applications is the extent to which users add their own data to that which you provide.
      • Therefore: Don’t restrict your “architecture of participation” to software development. Involve your users both implicitly and explicitly in adding value to your application.
    • Network Effects by Default
      Only a small percentage of users will go to the trouble of adding value to your application.
      • Therefore: Set inclusive defaults for aggregating user data as a side-effect of their use of the application.
    • Some Rights Reserved. Intellectual property protection limits re-use and prevents experimentation.
      • Therefore: When benefits come from collective adoption, not private restriction, make sure that barriers to adoption are low. Follow existing standards, and use licenses with as few restrictions as possible. Design for “hackability” and “remixability.”
    • The Perpetual Beta
      When devices and programs are connected to the internet, applications are no longer software artifacts, they are ongoing services.
      • Therefore: Don’t package up new features into monolithic releases, but instead add them on a regular basis as part of the normal user experience. Engage your users as real-time testers, and instrument the service so that you know how people use the new features.
    • Cooperate, Don’t Control
      Web 2.0 applications are built of a network of cooperating data services.
      • Therefore: Offer web services interfaces and content syndication, and re-use the data services of others. Support lightweight programming models that allow for loosely-coupled systems.
    • Software Above the Level of a Single Device
      The PC is no longer the only access device for internet applications, and applications that are limited to a single device are less valuable than those that are connected.
      • Therefore: Design your application from the get-go to integrate services across handheld devices, PCs, and internet servers.

-O’Reilly Website

In the world of Web 2.0, everyone creates, everyone writes, and everyone shares. User is the center of the information creation, not a single company/author. The idea behind web2 is to create an open online environment that everyone contributes. People are capable of generating new thoughts, and this capability should not be confined or undermined. Through web2, people connect (with others) via the internet.

Web 2.0 is a shift from old OS applications to the Internet services, as Google is actively developing services over the net. Why is Google so powerful? It does not create any content or new information, but it aggregates them and presents the aggregated data to users. Every bit of raw data that Google gets, everyone else can get (i.e. map data, web pages on internet, images). Google, however, take the information (data) to the next level. It reuse the data and generates information that is hard to recreate. It combines map with images. It combines reviews with business locations. The key is not to control over raw data, but to better use these information in more meaningful ways.

None of the content you find on Google is created by the company per say, but by you, by me, and by everyone else using internet. What it provides are ubiquitous services on the internet (assuming people have access to it) that people can use (and want to use). The key is re-using existing data, and make them useful

Here’s the powerpoint slideshow of my presentation on Web 2.0 for my Information Architecture class last semester (WARNING: not that interesting. Check it out ONLY IF you are just wayyyy toooo boring).